tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5874979429188093780.post5677808029768590711..comments2024-03-18T06:46:54.352+01:00Comments on Andrej Baranovskij Blog: Tuning ADF Tree - Retain View Link Accessor RowsetAndrej Baranovskijhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04468230464412457426noreply@blogger.comBlogger9125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5874979429188093780.post-49209086840890258042017-06-28T11:02:31.778+02:002017-06-28T11:02:31.778+02:00Hello Andrejus,
What is the xml for this option? ...Hello Andrejus,<br /><br />What is the xml for this option? I don't have the checkbox in my JDev 12.1.3... there is another approach?<br /><br />Best Regards,<br />FranciscoAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5874979429188093780.post-4138572467144462532013-09-21T15:36:43.890+02:002013-09-21T15:36:43.890+02:00I have a small query here..
I have VO1 , V02, V03...I have a small query here..<br /><br />I have VO1 , V02, V03<br /><br />VO1 has a view link with VO2<br />VO1 has a view link with VO3<br /><br />Now when i want to select the Retain View Link Accessor Rowset i want to retain only for the first View Link and not for the second one.<br /><br />May i know how this can be achieved. i am in great urgency for this solution.<br /><br />Any immediate solution is appreciated.<br /><br />Thanks in advance<br />Srinivas Pspotnuruhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01816608029436011462noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5874979429188093780.post-35539401775428007672013-05-23T11:53:00.801+02:002013-05-23T11:53:00.801+02:00This comment is from me and im saying it should wo...This comment is from me and im saying it should work.<br /><br />AndrejusAndrej Baranovskijhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04468230464412457426noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5874979429188093780.post-7561074794485305522013-05-23T11:46:23.822+02:002013-05-23T11:46:23.822+02:00Hello Andrejus,
Did you try out the last comment...Hello Andrejus, <br /><br />Did you try out the last comment on October 31, 2012 ? <br />I am also facing a similar issue, where the events (event change listner) is not getting fired, nor any changes to the existing detail rows is not getting reflected in the UI. <br /><br />-HariLakshmi Harihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10798082082768609453noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5874979429188093780.post-32692619645527682742012-10-31T14:40:21.908+01:002012-10-31T14:40:21.908+01:00"What happens if I modify the detail VO throu..."What happens if I modify the detail VO through the view link accessor, for example add new detail row or change an existing one" - this will be synchronized with detail VO and displayed on UI.<br /><br />AndrejusAndrej Baranovskijhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04468230464412457426noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5874979429188093780.post-59344048677257295512012-10-30T18:01:57.404+01:002012-10-30T18:01:57.404+01:00Hi,
Yes, detail VO is faster - is using data from...Hi,<br /><br />Yes, detail VO is faster - is using data from cache, there is no separate SQL execution.<br /><br />"Retain View Link Accessor Rowset" this option is good for another reason - for ADF trees. When user opening and collapsing same node - it will keep node children in memory.<br /><br />I will double check your second question about accessor changes and will get back.<br /><br />AndrejusAndrej Baranovskijhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04468230464412457426noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5874979429188093780.post-31167237007305249402012-10-30T10:55:14.264+01:002012-10-30T10:55:14.264+01:00Hi,
I saw your post about view link accessors and...Hi,<br /><br />I saw your post about view link accessors and detail VO from AM (http://andrejusb.blogspot.com/2012/05/view-link-accessor-usage-performance.html). I believe your conclusion was that detail VO is faster. How about using this "Retain View Link Accessor Rowset"? Does it change your opinion?<br /><br />And another question. What happens if I modify the detail VO through the view link accessor, for example add new detail row or change an existing one.<br /><br />Thanks in advance.Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02138000801013175503noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5874979429188093780.post-10359548262983189922012-02-29T08:39:22.948+01:002012-02-29T08:39:22.948+01:00Hi,
I have tested - no is not a problem. View Lin...Hi,<br /><br />I have tested - no is not a problem. View Link accessor is passivated/activated automatically with the rest of VO data.<br /><br />Thanks for question.<br /><br />AndrejusAndrej Baranovskijhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04468230464412457426noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5874979429188093780.post-20297287973879274922012-02-29T07:06:22.567+01:002012-02-29T07:06:22.567+01:00Andrejus,
Will this not be a problem in case of A...Andrejus,<br /><br />Will this not be a problem in case of Activation/Passivation ?<br /><br />-KamaalAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com